Page 49 - Industrial Plant 2015
P. 49

Table 3 – CO2 capture comparison and results

CO2 abated emission (t/h)   No CO2 capture               CO2 capture 1 (Pre-combustion)  CO2 capture 3 (Post-combustion)
NG consumption (Gcal/h)     0                            46.6                            80.5
Power consumption (MW)      Base                         +11.4                           +34.1
Investment cost (MM€)       Base                         +3.6                            +8.3
eAmCis(€s/iot nC)O2 abated  Base                         +32                             +102

                            0 41 – 50                                                    77 – 101

•	 CO2 capture technologies are available and                  rates, carbon market or socio/political decisions
      applicable to SR hydrogen plants; experience of          may have a highest impact than the error margins,
                                                               and may heavily affect the economics of the
      removal from syngas is consolidated; fewer               proposed solution.

      references are present in the removal from flue    References

      gas, but technology and interest is growing;       Amec Foster Wheeler Italiana for IEA GHG: Techno-
                                                         economic Evaluation of H2 Production with CO2 capture
•	 from an economic point of view, with the              (under development)
                                                         ICCA, 2009: Innovations for GHG Reductions, a Life
      assumptions indicated in the previous paragraph,   Cycle Quantification of Carbon Abatement Solutions
                                                         Enabled by the Chemical Industry.
      the CO2 abatement cost from flue gas is
      substantially higher than from raw H2 and in both
      cases higher than the current carbon credit;

•	 investment costs for the two alternatives have an

      approximation inherent in this kind of studies;

      however macroeconomic variables like interest

Guido Collodi

Guido is Process Director, Chemicals, in the Contract     hydrogen, ammonia, methanol and syngas. He then
Operations of Amec Foster Wheeler in Milan, with          became Technology Leader with process responsibility
responsibilities in fertilisers, syngas derivatives,      in major IGCC and gas to liquids projects.
hydrogen, and SNG technologies. Before joining Amec       Guido Collodi has published several papers on IGCC,
Foster Wheeler in 2006, Guido spent his career in the     gasification, hydrogen and flue gas treatment and
process department of Snamprogetti (now Saipem),          gained his degree in Chemical Engineering from
entrusted with inorganic chemical plants such as          University of Pisa, Italy, in 1979.

Giuliana Azzaro

Giuliana is a Chemical Engineer with over 10 years’       business sector with a focus on catalysts/absorbents
work experience in specialty chemicals, consumer          used in syngas, hydrogen, methanol and ammonia
products and oil & gas industries.                        plant applications.
She graduated in 2003 at Università degli Studi in        In Amec Foster Wheeler - Contract Operations - since
Palermo and afterwards she moved to the UK where          January 2011, Giuliana has taken part in the
she spent six years working for multinational companies,  development of several projects as a Senior Process
covering both manufacturing and process engineering       Engineer and Process Coordinator with a focus on
roles.                                                    Hydrogen Plants Design and Hydrogen Technology
Her background includes experience in catalyst            development.

                                                                                         Industrial Plants - May 2015

                                                                                                                          47
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54