Page 36 - Impiantistica industriale
P. 36

INDUSTRY & UNIVERSITY




                            2.  Blowdown (BD): Immediately before CO  bre-  zation step results in a direct improvement in pro-
                                                               2
                                aks through, the column should be regenera-  duct recovery.
                                ted. The feed step is stopped, and the pressu-  This means that part of the gas that will normally
                                re of the column reduced, counter-currently to   get lost in the blowdown step can be exploited to
                                the feed step. In this step, the lowest pressure   pressurize another column, losing less purifi ed gas.
                                of the system is achieved.            Having multiple columns helps in increasing the
                            3.  Purge (PG): When the low pressure is achie-  methane recovery because more pressure equali-
                                ved, the column is fed with a stream rich in   zation steps are possible in each cycle.
                                the light component (feedstock biogas and/  Commonly, three, four or six columns working in
                                or recycling of part of the product, i.e. puri-  parallel are installed to maintain the continuous
                                fi ed methane) at low pressure, to reduce the   process, where each column operates on a diffe-
                                amount of CO  in both the adsorbed and gas   rent step of the cycle.
                                           2
                                phases. The purge gas is recycled to the inlet   The primary task for VPSA process design is the
                                bed, recovering at the outlet an off-gas rich in   choice of the a dsorbent that should have high CO
                                                                                                            2
                                the heavy component (CO ).            adsorption capacity, high selectivity, as well as easy
                                                    2
                            4.  Pressurization (PR): In order to restart a new   regeneration and low costs.
                                cycle, the pressure should be increased. Pres-
                                surization can be carried out co-currently with
                                the feed stream (Feed Pressurization, FP) or
                                counter-currently with purifi ed CH  (Backfi ll,  Studies of adsorbents used
                                BF).                       4          in the PSA processes

                            The PSA process is very fl exible in design, the   Many studies of adsorbents used in PSA process
                            separation effi ciency varies strongly with the type   for  biogas  upgrading  focus  on  carbon  molecular
                            and structure of the adsorbent, cycle confi guration   sieves (CMS), activated carbons, zeolites, and me-
                            and the associated operating conditions (e.g., feed   tal-organic frameworks (MOFs).
                            composition, adsorption pressure, cycle time, pur-
                            ge fl ow rate).                               Many studies of adsorbents
                            To indicate the overall performance of a process
                            and allow for its quantifi able assessment, the key   used in PSA process for biogas
                            performance indicators (KPIs) commonly used are “upgrading focus on carbon
                            product purity and methane recovery, productivity   molecular sieves (CMS),
                            and energy usage.
                            These KPIs are dependent on each other and can-  activated carbons, zeolites,
                            not be individually optimized due to the nature of   and metal-organic frameworks
                            adsorption processes, so it is necessary to fi nd a
                            trade-off between them.                       (MOFs)
                            Compared to the basic cycle, many variations can
                            be introduced in the cycle confi guration, with the   Rodrigues’s group performed an investigation re-
                            introduction of new steps.                lated to the removal of CO  from biogas by VPSA
                                                                                           2
                            The fi rst improvement that can be introduced is   process using CMS and zeolite 13X . Comparisons
                                                                                                 8
                            vacuum regeneration, hence turning the process   of experimental results showed that VPSA process
                            into a VPSA, which results in higher adsorption ef-  with CMS adsorbent for biogas purifi cation could
                            fi ciency, at the cost of higher energy consumption.   achieve a better product recovery and productivi-
                            Furthermore, the introduction of a pressure equali-  ty at a specifi c CH  purity, as compared with that
                                                                                    4
                                                                      using zeolite 13X.
                                                                      The energy consumption of PSA upgrading bio-
                                                                      gas plant is ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 kWh/Nm3 of
                                                                      feed biogas. Wu et al. (2015) compared the energy
                                                                      consumption of a VPSA process employing me-
                                                                      tal-organic framework 508b (MOF-508b), carbon
                                                                      molecular sieve 3 K (CMS-3 K) and zeolite 13X as
                                                                      adsorbents to separate CO  from biogas  . Simu-
                                                                                                      9
                                                                                           2
                                                                      lation results revealed that energy consumption of
                                                                      VPSA process with MOF-508b and CMS-3 K was
                                                                      56% and 50% lower than the corresponding va-
                                                                      lues obtained with zeolite. The feed biogas can be
                                                                      upgraded up to 96-98% methane, with a loss in
                                                                      methane that can reach up to 4% through the off-
                                                                      gas stream.
                                                                      Abd and co-workers   investigated the removal of
                                                                                      10
                                                                      CO  from biogas mixture using PSA over carbon
                                                                        2
                                                                      molecular sieve (CMS-FB) using four beds. They
                                                                      found that the PSA operating conditions such as
       Figure 1 - Schematic representation of the different steps in a Skarstrom cycle  adsorption pressure, purge ratio, and desorption

       34 34  Impiantistica Italiana - Maggio-Giugno 2022
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41