Page 56 - impiantistica_3_2015
P. 56
4. Step 0 – Scoring system assigned shall follow the logic and the detailed
scoring indications for each parameter as stated
Quantitative values for the scoring can be herein.
standardized to range from 1 to 7, where 7 is the
most convenient position from Company’s point Matrices for Step 1 – Evaluation of split in
of view. As a rule of thumb, the scoring can be packages
designed to use integer numbers with the criteria Comparatively speaking, the parameters in table 4
in table 1. are considered the most relevant in the evaluation.
In order to make outcomes readily understandable
irrespective of the number of parameters evaluated Matrices for Step 2 – Evaluation of split of SoW
and/or the scale employed above, scoring may Comparatively speaking, the parameters in
be normalized (using predefined weights) and table 5 are considered the most relevant in the
expressed in percentage. An example of how the evaluation.
scoring and the normalization work is provided in
table 2. Matrices for Step 3 – Evaluation of contractual
compensation scheme
5. Step 0 - Matrices Comparatively speaking, the parameters the
(parameters and weights) parameters in table 6 are considered the most
relevant in the evaluation of the compensation
This step focuses on the understanding and scheme for each of the SoW’s alternatives.
qualitative scoring of the parameters for each
contracting method. Matrices for Step 4 – First appraisal of the Plant’s
On the basis of project information and building taking over scheme
on the descriptions reported previously, in order Comparatively speaking, the parameters in table
to evaluate (score) the most appropriate EPC 7 are considered the most relevant in the first
contracting method (in terms of alternatives appraise of the Plant’s taking over scheme.
for split in packages, SoW, contractual
compensation schemes and for taking over 6. Applied methodology
schemes), here below are framed the matrices
that will allow to proceed with Steps 1 to 5 of The methodology, as described in this paper and
the methodology. Therefrom, the scoring to be refined in Technip offices in Italy by capitalizing on
the knowledge acquired during the execution of
Fig. 4 - Alternative construction of the matrices
54 Impiantistica Italiana - Maggio-Giugno 2015
