Page 59 - 83
P. 59

g
                                                                       a
            (8) When shale absorbs CO , shale expands and              s
                                   2
            tends to close the induced cracks. This problem,
            which occurs also in coal, is the other problem.
            (9) Cost to supply CO  and maintain the facilities
                              2
            against corrosion due to carbonic acid.                  Allam cycle
                                                                                   power
            The loop of Allam cycle
            and extraction of shale gas
            with CO                                                   CO2
                                                                      SC-
                      2
            According to Los Alamos National Laboratory
            (Middleton and Carey, 2015), gas recovery from
            hydraulic fracturing is relatively poor (20/30%) and
            the SC-CO  could increase cumulative gas produc-
                     2
            tion by 100% or more compared to water.                    SC CO2
            It means that exhausted shale wells could poten-          shale gas     gas
            tially produce gas just using SC-CO  instead of wa-       extraction
                                        2
            ter (no need to drill because the wells are already                   CO2 sequestration
            existing).
            In this moment, with the cost of gas very low, se-
            veral shale gas companies are in troubled waters;
            using SC-CO  in existing exhausted wells to extract   Figure 7. Combination of Allam cycle and shale gas ex-
                       2
            shale gas and consequent CO  sequestration could   traction with SC-CO ; potential power generation from gas
                                                                    2
                                   2
            be the game changer for their business models.  without CO  emissions.
                                                              2
            As per Allam cycle, we can consider SC-CO  shale
                                              2
            gas extraction as a box where the inputs are SC-
            CO  and suitable proppants and outputs are shale   hydraulic fracturing of shale cores using viscous oil, wa-
               2
            gas and CO  sequestration.                ter, and liquid carbon dioxide, Rock Mechanics and Rock
                      2
            If we now combine the two boxes (Allam Cycle and   Engineering, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 1463–1473, doi:10.1007/
            SC-CO  shale extraction-see Figure 7) we could   s00603-015-0774-2 67.
                  2
            have the perfect loop that generates power from   Bullis, K. (2013): Fracking with carbon dioxide could help
            fossil fuel without CO  emissions in the atmosphe-  shale gas production in arid areas,  http://www.techno-
                             2
            re.                                       logyreview.com/news/512656/skipping-the-water-in-fra-
                                                      cking/
            Conclusion                                Bunger, A. P., A. Lakirouhani, and E. Detournay (2010): Mo-
                                                      delling the effect of injection system compressibility and vi-
            The article has presented a possible synergy   scous fluid flow on hydraulic fracture breakdown pressure,
            between the Allam cycle (based on supercritical   in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on In Situ
            CO ) and the extraction of shale gas with the same   Rock Stress, pp. 59–67.
               2
            supercritical CO2, output of the Allam cycle.  Ishida, T., Aoyagi, K., Niwa, T., Chen, Y., Murata, S., Chen,
            The combination of the two technologies could   Q. and Nakayama, Y. (2012): Acoustic emission monitoring
            lead to power generation from natural gas without   of hydraulic fracturing laboratory experiment with supercri-
            CO  emissions (thanks to the consequent seque-  tical and liquid CO , Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39,
                                                                  2
               2
            stration of CO  from the extraction of shale gas with   L16309, 2012, doi:10.1029/2012GL052788.
                       2
            supercritical CO ).                       Ishida, T., Chen, Y., Bennour, Z., Yamashita, H., Inui, S., Na-
                         2
            The article presented some of the current issues   gaya, Y., Naoi, M., Chen, Q., Nakayama, Y. and Nagano, Y.
            related to extraction with SC-CO , also underlining   (2016) : Features of CO  fracturing deduced from acoustic
                                                                      2
                                      2
            the advantages of supercritical CO  compared to   emission and microscopy in laboratory experiments, J. Ge-
                                        2
            hydraulic fracturing; particularly, the better recovery   ophys. Res. Solid Earth, Vol. 121, No. 11, pp. 8080–8098,
            capacity of shale gas extraction and the possibility   doi:10.1002/2016JB013365.
            of CO  sequestration.                     Ishida, T., Desaki, S., Yamashita, H., Inui, S., Naoi, M., Fujii,
                 2
                                                      H. and Katayama, T. (2017): Injection of supercritical carbon
            References                                dioxide into granitic rock and its acoustic emission monito-
                                                      ring, Procedia Engineering, 191, 476-482. (Proc. of Eurock
            L. Gandossi, C. Coltri, (2016): “Hydraulic Fracturing and   2017, Paper No. 106, Ostrava, Czech republic, 19–22 June,
            other Stimulation Technologies for Shale Gas Exploitation-   2017.) doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.206
            2016- Impiantistica italiana, May-June, p. 21.   Ishida, T., Desaki, S., Kishimoto, Y., Naoi, M. and Fujii, H.
            E. Giacomazzi, G. Messina (2015): “Exploitation of supercri-  (2018): Implosive Acoustic Emissions Induced by Injection
            tical CO  properties” ENEA.               of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide into a Hot Granitic Rock
                  2
            C. Coltri, (2015): “Extracting shale gas with supercritical   Mass, Geomechanics and Geodynamics of Rock Masses,
            CO ”. La Termotecnica, Sept. 2015, p. 65.  1369–1374, Taylor & Francis Group, London. (Proc. of the
               2
            Bennour, Z., Ishida, T., Nagaya, Y., Chen, Y., Nara, Y., Chen,   International European Rock Mechanics Symposium, EU-
            Q., Sekine, K. and Nagano, Y. (2015): Crack extension in   ROCK 2018, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 22-26 May 2018),
                                                                                 Impiantistica Italiana - Settembre-Ottobre 2020  57 57
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64