Page 73 - Impiantistica industriale
P. 73

Figure 1 - Simplified block scheme of the unit operations involved in the methanol production processes


                    SR Reactions          ΔH (kJ/mole)                 Notes
                 CH  + H O ↔ CO + 3H         +206         HT,LP if HP, then high Steam Reforming
                   4   2           2
                CH  + CO ↔ 2CO + 2H          +247                   CO  reforming
                   4    2          2                                   2
                 CO + H O ↔ CO  + H           -41                   Water gas shift
                       2      2   2
            Table 2 - SR reactions and Heat of Reactions

                     ATR Reactions           ΔH  (kJ/mole)             Description
                CH  + 3/2 O  → CO + 2H O         -519               Methane combustion
                   4      2         2
                  CH  + H O ↔ CO + 3H            +206                 Steam reforming
                    4   2           2
                  CO + H O ↔ CO  + H             -41                  Water gas shift
                        2       2  2
            Table 3 - ATR reactions and Heat of Reactions

                         POx reactions               ΔH (kJ/mol)          Description
                     CH  + 0.50  → CO + 2H             -35.7             Partial Oxidation
                       4      2         2
                     CH  + 20  → CO  + 2H O            -890.3             Total Oxidation
                       4    2     2    2
                     CH  + H 0 ↔ CO + 3H               +206.0            Steam reforming
                        4   2          2
                     CH  + CO  ↔ 2CO + 2H              +247.0             CO  reforming
                       4     2          2                                   2
                      CO + H 0 ↔ CO  + H               -41.2              Water gas shift
                            2      2   2

            Table 4 - POx reactions and Heat of Reactions
            at the requested overall molar steam to carbon ratio, is   The Table 2 below summarizes the main reactions for
            preheated in the convection section of the reformer fur-  the synthesis gas production of the first block of figure 1
            nace and then distributed over the catalyst tubes of the   above in case of SR technology
            reformer. The product gas leaving the reformer is essen-  ATR technology 16, 17  developed in the late 1970’s. The
            tially an equilibrium mixture of hydrogen, carbon monox-  process requires a furnace for pre-heating at ca. 550°C
            ide, carbon dioxide, methane and steam (see the table   a mixture of NG and steam that reacts with an oxygen
            2 below). The overall heat effect of the steam reforming   stream in a burner. The burner is located at the inlet of
            reactions is strongly endothermic i.e. heat has to be sup-  a combustion chamber at the top of the ATR reactor.
            plied externally to achieve the required conversion.   The sub-stoichiometric turbulent diffusion flame reach-
            This heat is provided by combustion of PSA purge gas   es 2500°C and the burner design minimises the heat
            as priority fuel and natural gas as make-up fuel.  transfer from thermal radiation. Controlled Thermal Se-
             The main features of the technology have not changed   verity (CTS) burners allow low S/C values operation. In
            since the first industrial plant, and its improvement con-  this case, the already converted gas from the thermal
            cerned the single elements of the technology (furnaces,   zone recirculates upward for improving the thermal sta-
            catalysts, reforming tubes) and their integration. In par-  bility of the flame. The mixture produced in the combus-
            ticular, it is noted that the risk of creep in the reforming   tion chamber flows into a catalytic zone that completes
            tubes led to new materials with higher resistance and   the steam and CO  reforming reactions reaching at the
                                                                   2
            high heat transfer coefficients while catalyst formula-  end of the catalytic bed temperatures between 850-
            tion improved for inhibit the carbon formation reactions.   1100°C.
            These improvements have led to better performances   POx    is an exothermic non-catalytic process produc-
                                                         18, 19
            and relative cost reduction even if the process concept   ing the synthesis through a sub-stoichiometric combus-
            has not changed since the early beginnings.  tion flame. High temperatures are required to achieve full


                                                                                  Impiantistica Italiana - Gennaio-Febbraio 2022  67 67
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78