Page 39 - Impiantistica Industriale
P. 39

Figure 9. Study Results -  Capex, Gross Operating Margin (GOM, @2025), Net Present Value (@12% and @10% as discount rate), Internal Rate of Return

                                  made, the economic benefi ts of shifting from Ga-
                                  soline to aromatics and furthermore to olefi ns does   A step-wise implementation strategy
                                  exist notwithstanding the current depressed crude
                                  oil pricing scenario (Figure 9).            should be taken into consideration to
                                  Comparing the cases under scrutiny, it is worthwhi-  dilute the great investment required for
                                  le noting that the full integration option as imple-  implementing a fully integrated Complex
                                  mented in Case 3 represents for the investor both
                                  the greatest efforts in terms of initial capital require-
                                  ments (30% higher than Refi nery stand-alone op-
                                  tion) and the highest return in terms of:  facilities also allow for energy optimization, thus
                                  •   Gross Operating Margin accounted for 2025   improving overall effi ciency, which results in lo-
                                     at around 3 billion USD against 1.5 billion of   wer utility consumption.
                                     Case 1                                All in all, a step-wise implementation strategy
                                  •   Net Present Value @10% discount rate, asses-  can be taken into consideration to dilute the
                                     sed at about 6 billion USD at the end of the   great investment required for implementing a full
                                     economic life considered (20 years) against   integrated Complex that also make the project
                                     0.9 billion USD for Case 1 (and even against   execution more manageable considering the size
                                     losses of  400 MMUSD for Case 1 when in-  and complexity of the initiative.
                                     creasing the acceptable threshold limit for di-
                                     scount rate at 12%).
                                                                           Conclusions
                                  In such a frame, it is paramount to mention that   While each refi nery across the globe is confi gured
                                  common facilities (utilities, offsite and infrastruc-  differently and may serve different markets—ma-
                                  ture of the full-integrated Case 3) impact the ca-  king each facility distinctly unique— there are se-
                                  pital expenditure in an extremely positive man-  veral common advantages that in today’s scenario
                                  ner with respect to Case 1, as the capital cost   the refi ners can appreciated from an integrated
                                  of building utilities and off-sites are in the range   complex regardless the specifi c site needs:
                                  of 40% of the total project cost. The integrated   •   Higher profi tability



                                                                                 Impiantistica Italiana - Settembre-Ottobre 2017  37
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44