Page 49 - 85
P. 49

zation and competitiveness, access to infra-
                structure and consumers, applied trade me-
                chanisms);                              Bcm    337
            •   fundamental indicators of the industry (supply              324          286
                and demand, structure of the fuel and energy                                           220
                balance);                                                                                   167
            •   government rental policy and related taxation;                    94           157
            •   regulatory mechanisms and pricing models.
                                                                      9
            External:
            •   dynamics of fundamental indicators;
            •   pricing practice (mainly in Europe);  Figure 1. Gazprom’s vs. IGP’s volumes of natural gas supply to the RF domestic market
            •   requirements of international agreements.  Source: compiled by the authors based on the data of the Companies
            For Russia, the optimality of the applied gas mar-  according to the federal laws, have different op-
            ket regulation models is difficult to overestimate.   tions to sell gas delivered via pipeline to domestic
            Indeed,  the correct choice of  such a model di-  consumers.
            rectly depends on whether Russia can monetize
            its world’s largest gas reserves with a rate of re-  The Russian domestic gas
            turn that would be sufficient both for solving socio-
            economic problems and ensuring stability and pre-  market model is dual-tiered,
            dictability of the gas business. Today, the answer “shared between Gazprom
            to this question is not obvious because of the fol-  and the Independent
            lowing reasons.
            The mechanisms of economic regulation of the   Gas Producers (IGPs)
            gas market operating in the Russian Federation do
            not contain built-in tools for controlling production   The share of the IGPs in Russian natural gas pro-
            costs, motivate investment planning without taking   duction accounted for about 25%. The largest
            into account their effectiveness, and do not set li-  independent gas company, “Novatek”, produced
            mits on the growth of gas prices and gas transpor-  74.7 billion cubic meters in 2019. However, given
            tation tariffs. This determines two main risks: the   the fact that Gazprom has the monopoly on the
            first is a decrease in the efficiency of the national   export of network gas, the share of IGPs in sup-
            industry due to excessively high prices and tariffs   plying gas to the domestic market is slightly higher
            for gas, the second is stagnation or a reduction in   and amounts to approximately 35%. Data on the
            gas production due to excessively low prices if their   dynamics of the ratio of gas deliveries to Russian
            growth is “frozen”.                       consumers is shown in Figure 1.
            The implementation of any of these risks will lead
            to the expectations and opportunities of Russian   The logos shows the largest Russian IGP’s in the
            suppliers in terms of prices and volumes not coin-  corresponding  year. Gazprom  exercises  de jure
            ciding with the expectations and capabilities of gas   and de facto control and regulatory functions on
            consumers. That means that the supply side will   the access to the Gas Transportation System of the
            not be able to supply gas to consumers in such an   UGSS; pipeline gas flows and transactions of inde-
            amount and at a price that will satisfy them.  pendent producers via project design activities (the
            An effective price for a producer is one that covers   main design organizations are part of Gazprom’s
            costs and provides a rate of return sufficient for ex-  structure) and  the country’s balance sheet of gas
            panded reproduction in the industry. There are two   production and consumption (the IGPs have no
            ways to ensure this sufficiency. Either raise the pri-  right to produce and supply gas to consumers wi-
            ce, or reduce costs. Opportunities for further price   thout accounting their volumes in the balance and
            increases (domestic and export) in Russia seem to   volumes and directions of the gas supplies sold on
            be exhausted. Apparently, the option of reducing   the Russian gas exchange).
            costs remains. Is it possible in Russia? And within
            what national model of gas market regulation? The
            search for such an optimal model is the challenge
            facing the state, industry and society as a whole.  Russian gas market
                                                      on the path of slow but
                                                      sustainable reforms
            Key features of the russian               Although Gazprom’s monopoly position in the do-
            natural gas market structure              mestic market is still strong enough it has begun to
                                                      decline gradually since the mid-2000s. In 2013 the
            The Russian domestic gas market model is dual-  Government of the Russian Federation allowed the
            tiered. It is shared between Gazprom - that holds a   largest IGPs (namely “Novatek” and “Rosneft”) to
            whole gas value chain “from the well to the burner”,   export liquefied natural gas (LNG). In 2014 natural
            and the Independent Gas Producers (IGPs) – that,   gas exchange has been launched in Russia. These



                                                                                  Impiantistica Italiana - Gennaio-Febbraio 2021  45
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54